ck:code-review

Run an adversarial code review on a PR diff by providing the pull request as the target. The review actively tries to break the code to identify and document security holes, logical flaws, and failure modes.

Adversarial code review applies an always-on red-team perspective to identify weaknesses, false assumptions, and failure modes. It actively tries to break the code to find subtle security risks and logical flaws that standard reviews often miss.

Yes, you can scan a full codebase for security flaws and logical errors. The review supports multiple input modes including PR diffs, commit hashes, pending changes, and full codebase scans to guide targeted reviews.

To get remediation guidance for code vulnerabilities, provide your pending changes as the target. The review returns structured actionable findings with clear severity, impact, and specific remediation guidance to strengthen the codebase.

Yes, this code review approach works directly with commit diffs. You can provide a commit hash as the target to generate an evidence-based critique that documents failure modes and security holes in those specific changes.

The best way to find false assumptions in code changes is using an adversarial, evidence-based critique. This approach actively attempts to break the code, returning structured findings with severity and impact to strengthen the codebase.