citation-grounding-and-claim-discipline

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps reviewers and section writers detect unsupported claims, citation gaps, overstatements, and mismatches between manuscript prose and available evidence, reducing the risk of misleading or unsubstantiated conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Highlight major claims that need direct support and classify them by type: direct observation, literature comparison, field background, mechanistic explanation, or recommendation.
• Verify that each claim has the appropriate support type (citation, artifact, figure/table, or explicit uncertainty) and flag overbroad language with suggested narrower wording.
• Run integrity checks including numeric consistency with figures/tables, citation relevance, and potential self-plagiarism to guide substantive revisions.
• Use Case: After drafting a results or discussion subsection, produce revision notes listing unsupported claims, missing citations, and recommended wording downgrades.

Quick Start

Use the review to list unsupported claims and recommend citation or wording fixes for the attached section.