citation-audit

To verify LaTeX citations match referenced papers, audit your .bib files and .tex context against canonical indexes. This process cross-checks bibliographic metadata and confirms the cited work supports the specific sentence claim, preventing research integrity failures before submission.

Citation context checking evaluates whether a cited paper truly supports the surrounding sentence claim. It is needed for research integrity to flag wrong-context, weak, or unsupported uses in your manuscript, ensuring your bibliographic entries are real, accurately described, and contextually appropriate.

You can check if bib entries exist online by performing real web, DBLP, and arXiv lookups. This confirms your cited works can be located via arXiv, DOI, or venue records, validating authors, title, year, and venue against canonical metadata indexes.

Yes, you can detect unused bib entries in soft-only mode without modifying the bib file. This mode freezes your .bib files and operates as a detect-only advisory, reporting bib entries that appear unused while proposing sentence rewrites instead of mutating the original bibliography.

Yes, citation auditing works with ACL Anthology and OpenReview metadata. The verification process validates authors, title, year, and venue against canonical indexes including DBLP, ACL Anthology, and OpenReview to ensure your bibliography entries are authentic and accurately described.

Citation audit results are reported in a machine-readable JSON verdict ledger and a human-readable Markdown report. These files contain per-reference verdicts and context audit results, providing comprehensive submission pre-flight checks for your LaTeX paper directory.