chronology

Build a litigation chronology by reading the matter workspace configuration to extract dated events from production documents, Bates exports, and uploads. The tool enforces a privilege posture, tags event significance, and writes a formatted chronology file to the matter directory.

Yes, you can generate a statement of facts variant from a document timeline by running the chronology generation with a specific format flag. It extracts dated events, applies significance tagging based on matter theory, and outputs a defensible statement of facts.

Significance tagging works by evaluating extracted events against the matter theory and side framing, such as plaintiff or defense, to assign priority levels. Each chronology entry receives a significance tag to help you quickly identify critical facts during review.

A privilege gate in e-discovery chronology generation is a mandatory posture selection that forces you to choose between A-cleared, B-mixed, or C-aborted before processing. It ensures privilege protection is enforced and records provenance on every legal statement to support later review.

Yes, chronology generation handles de-duplication by merging duplicate events extracted from multiple custody sets and production sources. It consolidates overlapping entries while maintaining provenance tagging to ensure a clean, defensible matter timeline.

Yes, you can update an existing matter timeline with incremental document productions. The chronology generator reads newly declared sources, extracts additional dated events, de-duplicates against existing entries, and rewrites the chronology file with updated significance tagging.