What problem does it solve? When revising Chinese long-form fiction, authors struggle to objectively judge whether a new chapter draft actually fulfills the chapter card, reader contract, and genre promises—or whether it quietly regressed compared to the previous version. This Skill performs structured draft-to-baseline comparison and produces evidence-backed diagnoses without rewriting any prose. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Baseline Coverage Check: Verifies which reference materials (chapter card, reader contract, previous version, project bible) are available and lowers confidence when key baselines are missing. - Comparison Matrix: Evaluates eight dimensions—chapter goals, conflict escalation, information gain, character progression, continuity, chapter-end hooks, genre payoff, and dialogue/style—with evidence for every gap. - Regression Flags & Handoff: Explicitly lists what the new draft lost versus the old version, grades issues as blocking/needs_revision/deferred/pass, and routes each fix to the right owner skill. - Use Case: You have a candidate chapter draft, the previous accepted version, and a chapter card. The Skill produces a verdict report showing the draft broke a knowledge boundary from chapter 12 and weakened the ending hook, with minimal fix actions assigned to the continuity and pacing skills. ## Quick Start Ask the assistant to compare this chapter candidate draft against the chapter card, previous version, and reader contract, listing gaps, regressions, evidence, risk levels, and a revision handoff.
