character-moral-ideology-conflict-designer

Designs fictional conflicts driven by values, ideology, legitimacy, and competing moral visions.

Updated Aug 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yeisme/auctra-novel-skills --skill character-moral-ideology-conflict-designer-yeisme
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: character-moral-ideology-conflict-designer
Source: https://github.com/yeisme/auctra-novel-skills/tree/main/character-modeling/character-moral-ideology-conflict-designer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yeisme/auctra-novel-skills --skill character-moral-ideology-conflict-designer-yeisme

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Writers often reduce ideological conflicts to simple good-versus-evil splits, producing flat villains and unconvincing factions. This Skill turns abstract disagreements into credible conflicts where each side has genuine values, fears, legitimacy claims, and internal dissent. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Dual-Sided Conflict Modeling: Maps each faction's protected values, feared catastrophes, legitimacy sources, sacred commitments, and self-interest so both sides have credible internal logic. - Faction Internal Structure: Generates internal dissent roles such as moderates, purists, cynical enforcers, beneficiaries, and swing voters, plus propaganda framing and public-versus-private belief gaps. - Scene Material Generation: Produces persuasion scenes, moral choice scenes, and cost-exposure scenes with falsifiable conditions that can shift a character's stance. - Use Case: When writing a political reform arc in a novel, use this Skill to define what the reformists and conservatives each protect and fear, then generate a scene where a character must rank two values they both believe are right. ## Quick Start Design a credible ideological conflict between two factions in my story where both sides have legitimate values and internal dissent.

Frequently Asked Questions about character-moral-ideology-conflict-designer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I write a fictional ideological conflict where both sides are believable?▼

Give each faction at least one genuine protected value and one self-interested motive, then define what catastrophe each side fears rather than only what victory it wants. This Skill structures that process into values, legitimacy sources, internal dissent, and cost-exposure scenes.

How to design factions with internal disagreement in a novel?▼

Model internal roles such as moderates, purists, cynical enforcers, beneficiaries, victims, and swing members so the faction never speaks with one voice. The Skill's workflow explicitly builds these dissenting positions and their distinct interpretations of the shared cause.

What inputs does this character conflict design skill need?▼

It needs the conflict topic, factions, historical trauma, resource and institutional environment, plus each character's values, identity, public stance, private interests, non-negotiables, and goal arc. Optional inputs include social context packages, group structures, and existing speeches or dialogue.

Can this skill help write real-world political propaganda or persuasion campaigns?▼

No. The Skill explicitly refuses to optimize real-world extremism, hate, violent mobilization, or political manipulation, and does not portray real protected groups as inherent threats. It is scoped to fictional conflict design for storytelling.

How do I make a character change their ideological position convincingly?▼

Define falsifiable shift conditions such as new evidence, personally witnessed harm, identity betrayal, power temptation, companion sacrifice, or institutional failure. The Skill requires at least one such condition that can change a stance or expose cynicism.