What problem does it solve? Manually grading Korean law case-study (사례형) answers and assembling related study materials is slow and inconsistent. This Skill automates provisional grading, consistency checks against model answers and explanations, and collection of related issues, statutes, precedents, and practice problems into a single review report. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Provisional Grading with Rubric: Scores answers on issue spotting, keyword match, structure, conclusion, and fact-to-law application using a weighted rubric, marking items as pending when source material is missing. - Consistency Verification: Cross-checks the answer against question sheets, model answers, explanations, and textbook RAG chunks, citing exact evidence locations for every deduction. - Study Packet Generation: Auto-matches case material bundles by lecture, converts multiple-choice items into O/X drills, analyzes weak points, and proposes spaced-repetition and Anki card follow-ups. - Use Case: A law student submits a civil law answer draft on capacity to act; the Skill produces a Markdown review report with matched issues, grading, missing points with source citations, related past exam problems, and suggested review items saved to case_answer_packet.json. ## Quick Start Run the render_case_answer_review.py script with the subject, topic, and answer text to generate a provisional grading report and study packet.
