bzd-problem-analysis-checker

Provide the complete original problem, any attachment descriptions, and your drafted 问题分析 text. The review maps each task to your paragraphs, checks mathematical-type classification and model rationale, and returns a severity-graded issue list with revision priorities.

It checks task coverage and mathematical classification, data-support reasoning, cross-question linkage, model-choice rationale, validation planning, chapter boundaries, and the overall solution framework. It distinguishes evidence-supported claims from unverified assumptions.

Yes. The review works from the original problem and your draft alone. Missing paper body or attachment data is reported as unverifiable items rather than treated as errors, so partial materials still yield useful feedback.

No. It diagnoses issues first and does not replace the section. If you later request revision, it preserves confirmed facts and intended models, using explicit placeholders for missing evidence instead of fabricating content.

Concrete predictions, final weights or rankings, optimal solutions, error values, validation conclusions, long formulas, derivations, and program logs belong to later chapters. The analysis section should describe modeling plans and rationale, not computed results.