business-review

Automate Relaticle v3 business-review workflows with stage 0–6 orchestration and browser-truth verification.

1.5k|170|Updated Sep 25, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/relaticle/relaticle --skill business-review-relaticle
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: business-review
Source: https://github.com/relaticle/relaticle/tree/main/.claude/skills/business-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/relaticle/relaticle --skill business-review-relaticle

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The Skill enables a structured, browser-grounded review of code changes in Relaticle by coordinating a multi-persona fleet, discovering live environment details, and producing verifiable verdicts that hinge on real UI observations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Environment discovery and preflight gating before planning tests against a running Relaticle instance.
  • Journey synthesis from the diff and CRM priors, covering happy and sad paths.
  • Adversarial verification, regression ledger management, and optional fix-mode workflows.
  • Automated planning, execution, and publish-ready reporting for PRs or local diffs.

Quick Start

Run a review workflow against a diff to boot Stage 0 discovery, plan, run, verify, and report.

Frequently Asked Questions about business-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate browser-testing and UI review for code changes?▼

Automate browser-testing for code changes by orchestrating a multi-persona fleet that discovers environment details, synthesizes happy and sad path journeys from the diff, and executes tests against the live app to produce a verifiable verdict.

What is regression ledger management in diff-review workflows?▼

Regression ledger management in diff-review workflows tracks adversarial verification results and blockers across stages, enforcing safety gates and anti-tampering rules to prevent false positives and ensure reproducible browser-truth verification outcomes.

Can I run QA regression workflows against a local diff or only for PRs?▼

You can run QA regression workflows against both local diffs and pull requests, executing environment discovery, tier planning, and browser-truth verification to generate publish-ready reporting with explicit review artifacts.

Does browser-truth verification require a running instance before planning tests?▼

Browser-truth verification requires a running instance for preflight gating, performing environment discovery before planning tests to ensure the multi-persona fleet executes journeys against actual live UI observations rather than assumptions.

What's the best way to prevent false positives in automated UI regression testing?▼

Prevent false positives in automated UI regression testing by enforcing explicit review artifacts, anti-tampering rules, and safety gates throughout stage 0–6 workflows, ensuring all verdicts hinge on real browser-truth observations from the live app.

When should I not use a panel-of-QAs approach for change verification?▼

Avoid using a panel-of-Qas approach for change verification when the environment cannot provide a live running instance for browser-truth verification, as the workflow depends on real UI observations and preflight gating to produce reproducible results.