build-review-chat

Coordinates concurrent implementer and reviewer workflows with per-slice independent code review.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/eeemzs/aops --skill build-review-chat-eeemzs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: build-review-chat
Source: https://github.com/eeemzs/aops/tree/main/assets/disciplines/build-review-chat
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/eeemzs/aops --skill build-review-chat-eeemzs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? When two agents work concurrently on code, unreviewed changes slip through and coordination chatter replaces real verification. This discipline enforces that every implementation slice is independently reviewed and accepted before work proceeds. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Slice-bound reviews: Each implementation slice is tied to a Projectman microtask and validated before a review request is opened. - Independent verification: The reviewer checks code and runtime evidence on their own; chat is used only to wake or coordinate, never as the review record. - Finding tracking: Material findings become linked issues rather than disappearing into chat history. - Use Case: An implementer agent finishes a bounded feature slice, opens a Projectman review request with exact scope and evidence, pings the reviewer over ChatV3, resolves findings, and only proceeds after acceptance. ## Quick Start Use the build-review-chat discipline so the implementer and reviewer work concurrently with each slice independently reviewed before commit.

Frequently Asked Questions about build-review-chat

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run concurrent implementer and reviewer agents on the same codebase?▼

Assign one agent as implementer and another as reviewer, then bind each implementation slice to a Projectman microtask. The implementer opens a review request with exact scope and evidence, and the reviewer verifies code and runtime behavior independently before acceptance.

What is ChatV3 used for in a build-review workflow?▼

ChatV3 is used only to wake or coordinate with the reviewer, not to conduct the review itself. Review scope, evidence, and findings live in Projectman review requests and linked issues so nothing material stays only in chat.

When should I use aops-cli-discuss with this discipline?▼

Use aops-cli-discuss only for material design consensus, such as deciding between architectural approaches. Routine slice reviews and coordination go through Projectman review requests and ChatV3 instead.

Does an accepted review authorize committing or publishing code?▼

No. A review result does not authorize commit, publish, deletion, or any other operator effect. Those actions remain separate decisions outside the review acceptance.

What happens to review findings in this workflow?▼

Material findings become linked issues in Projectman rather than remaining in chat messages. The implementer resolves them, requests re-review, and proceeds only after the reviewer accepts the slice.