skills.rest
Rinzler78
Rinzler78COMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Review content for weaknesses, omissions, and defects with a Markdown findings list.

1|Updated Dec 22, 2022
Search Tags:#quality assurance#document review#critical analysis#findings#adversarial review
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Rinzler78/osmosis-launcher --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-rinzler78
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: bmad-review-adversarial-general
Source: https://github.com/Rinzler78/osmosis-launcher/tree/main/.agents/skills/bmad-review-adversarial-general
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Rinzler78/osmosis-launcher --skill bmad-review-adversarial-general-rinzler78

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you critically review content for gaps, weaknesses, and mistakes that a superficial pass would miss. It is designed for situations where you need a skeptical second opinion on a spec, diff, document, or other artifact.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversarial Review: Examines content with extreme skepticism and looks for missing details, contradictions, and weak assumptions.
  • Findings Report: Produces a concise Markdown list of issues to fix or improve.
  • Use Case: Use it to review a proposal, change set, or design doc when you want a rigorous critique before moving forward.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to perform an adversarial review of the provided content and return the findings as a Markdown list.

Frequently Asked Questions about bmad-review-adversarial-general

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform an adversarial review of a design document?▼

An adversarial review examines content with extreme skepticism to identify missing details, contradictions, and weak assumptions that a casual read would miss. It outputs a concise Markdown list of issues requiring fixes or improvements.

Can I use this for critical analysis of code diffs and specs?▼

Yes, critical analysis of code diffs and specs is supported. The review evaluates these artifacts for gaps, weaknesses, and mistakes, returning a structured Markdown findings list to ensure rigorous critique before moving forward.

What is the best way to find flaws in a proposal before moving forward?▼

The best way to find flaws is requesting a skeptical evaluation of the proposal. This process identifies omissions, defects, and contradictions, producing a Markdown findings list that highlights issues to fix before proceeding.

Does this adversarial review require any external components or dependencies?▼

No external components or dependencies are required. The review relies entirely on careful issue identification to evaluate documents, diffs, and specs, producing a standalone Markdown findings list without needing external integrations.

What format does the findings report use for identified document weaknesses?▼

The findings report uses a concise Markdown list format. It details the weaknesses, omissions, and defects discovered during the skeptical evaluation, providing a structured output for fixing or improving the reviewed artifact.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
diegosanchespereira1diegosanchespereira1

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify defects, omissions, and weak assumptions in provided content.

Community
Intermediate
GenEducationGenEducation

bmad-review-adversarial-general

Identify defects, gaps, and weak assumptions in submitted content with Markdown findings.

Official
Basic
AtharvaN16AtharvaN16

setup-pre-commit

Automate Husky pre-commit hook setup with lint-staged and Prettier.

Community
Intermediate
adityasingh2400adityasingh2400
2

review

Analyze pull request diffs against the base branch for SQL safety and structural risks.

Community
Advanced