Automated-Code-Review-Cycle

Automate GitHub PR review cycles with Codex and Gemini feedback.

Updated Jan 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/SAZO-KR/sazo-toolkit --skill automated-code-review-cycle
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Automated-Code-Review-Cycle
Source: https://github.com/SAZO-KR/sazo-toolkit/tree/main/packages/ai-harness/skills/automated-code-review-cycle
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/SAZO-KR/sazo-toolkit --skill automated-code-review-cycle

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

자동으로 Codex와 Gemini의 PR 코드 리뷰를 수집하고, 피드백을 적용한 뒤 재리뷰를 사용자 개입 없이 반복합니다. Gemini가 비활성화된 저장소에서도 Codex만으로 판단합니다.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end PR review automation: Codex와 Gemini에서 피드백을 수집하고 재리뷰를 반복하는 전체 워크플로를 자동화합니다.
  • Quota-aware retry & fallbacks: 리뷰 피드백 부족이나 쿼타 초과 상황에서 자동으로 대체 경로를 시도합니다.
  • 자동 커밋/푸시/답변 생성: 수정사항을 커밋하고 푸시한 후 리뷰에 답변으로 커밳 링크를 제공합니다.

Quick Start

PR를 생성하면 이 스킬이 Codex/Gemini의 리뷰를 자동으로 수집하고 수정사항을 반영한 뒤 커밋하고 푸시하여 재리뷰를 반복합니다.

Frequently Asked Questions about Automated-Code-Review-Cycle

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate GitHub pull request code reviews with Codex and Gemini?▼

Automated PR code reviews collect feedback from Codex and Gemini, apply fixes, commit, push, and re-submit until all reviewers pass without manual intervention. The workflow detects the target PR, fetches feedback, evaluates it, and posts structured replies automatically.

Can I run automated code review cycles using only Codex if Gemini is disabled?▼

Yes, automated code review cycles work with Codex alone in repositories where Gemini is disabled. The workflow safely falls back to Codex-only evaluation, handling quota checks and feedback collection independently without requiring Gemini integration.

What happens when Codex or Gemini hits a quota limit during a PR review cycle?▼

When a quota limit is hit during a PR review cycle, the workflow triggers safe fallback paths and retry logic. It evaluates available feedback, attempts alternative routes, and pauses re-submission to prevent failures from exceeding API limits.

How does an automated bot apply fixes to a pull request after receiving code review feedback?▼

After receiving code review feedback, the bot evaluates the comments, applies fixes locally, runs tests, commits the changes, and pushes them to the pull request branch. It then posts a structured reply with the commit link for reviewer visibility.

What is the best way to handle repetitive pull request review cycles without manual intervention?▼

The best way to handle repetitive PR review cycles is end-to-end automation that records cycle start time, fetches feedback, applies fixes, runs tests, commits, pushes, and re-submits until all reviewers pass, with built-in quota-aware retries and safe fallbacks.