auto-review-loop-llm

Iteratively review and refine research drafts until acceptance criteria are met.

1|Updated May 14, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/lix965996-art/MMM --skill auto-review-loop-llm-lix965996-art
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop-llm
Source: https://github.com/lix965996-art/MMM/tree/main/resources/app/skills/auto-review-loop-llm
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lix965996-art/MMM --skill auto-review-loop-llm-lix965996-art

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you iteratively refine a research draft by running a structured review-improve-review loop with an external LLM, reducing the risk of submitting work that still has major weaknesses.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Autonomous review loop: Performs repeated cycles of reviewer assessment, fix implementation, and re-review until quality passes or the maximum rounds are reached.
  • Action-driven improvements: Extracts score, verdict, and prioritized weaknesses from reviewer output, then applies the minimum necessary fixes.
  • Persistent recovery and logging: Saves compact round state to REVIEW_STATE.json and appends a cumulative, expandable review history to AUTO_REVIEW.md for continuity across runs.
  • Use Case: You have a draft with experiments and results; this Skill reviews it like a senior venue reviewer, identifies critical gaps, applies targeted changes, and rechecks readiness across up to four rounds.

Quick Start

Run auto review loop llm on your research topic to produce a score, verdict, and prioritized fix plan, then continue improving until the work is ready or MAX_ROUNDS is reached.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop-llm

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I autonomously iterate on a research draft to meet acceptance criteria?▼

An autonomous review loop automates research refinement by iteratively reviewing a draft, implementing prioritized fixes, and re-reviewing until acceptance criteria are met or maximum rounds are reached.

What is venue-style scoring for research review?▼

Venue-style scoring evaluates research drafts like a senior venue reviewer, extracting a score, verdict, and prioritized weaknesses to apply targeted changes across multiple rounds.

Do I need an OpenAI-compatible reviewer API to run the autonomous review loop?▼

Yes, the autonomous review loop requires an OpenAI-compatible reviewer API via reviewer_client.py to perform automated assessment and apply actionable critiques.

How does the review loop handle recovery and continuity across runs?▼

The review loop persists compact round state in REVIEW_STATE.json and appends cumulative review history to AUTO_REVIEW.md, ensuring recovery and transparency across interrupted runs.

What is the maximum number of rounds for automated research improvement?▼

The automated research improvement loop runs for up to four rounds, applying minimum necessary fixes extracted from reviewer output until the work passes quality gates.

Can I use the review loop for ML documentation workflows?▼

Yes, the review loop supports both research and ML documentation workflows where quality gates require venue-style scoring and actionable critiques across multiple rounds.