auto-review-loop-llm

Automates an end-to-end ML research review loop with cross-model critique and iterative fixes.

Updated Apr 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jandan138/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill auto-review-loop-llm-jandan138
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: auto-review-loop-llm
Source: https://github.com/jandan138/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep/tree/main/skills/auto-review-loop-llm
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jandan138/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep --skill auto-review-loop-llm-jandan138

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Autonomously iterates over research tasks to identify weaknesses in a given ML research artifact, propose fixes, implement them, and re-evaluate until a satisfactory score or predefined rounds are completed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • End-to-end autonomous review cycle for ML research outputs (claims, methods, results).
  • Supports multiple external reviewers via MCP chat interfaces for cross-model critique.
  • Persists progress with ROUND reviews and logs to a central file.

Quick Start

Initiate the autonomous review loop on the current project by enabling an external reviewer via the llm-chat MCP and setting the review scope.

Frequently Asked Questions about auto-review-loop-llm

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate the ML research review process end-to-end?▼

You can automate the ML research review process by running an autonomous loop that coordinates cross-model critiques, implements fixes, and re-evaluates research artifacts until a target score or round limit is reached.

What is an autonomous review loop for machine learning research?▼

An autonomous review loop for ML research is an automated cycle that identifies weaknesses in research artifacts, proposes and applies fixes, and re-evaluates the results progressively across multiple model providers.

How do I set up an MCP server for cross-model critique in research evaluation?▼

To set up cross-model critique, you need to configure an MCP server for llm-chat alongside an OpenAI-compatible LLM API, enabling external reviewers to iteratively evaluate and fix your research artifacts.

How does this autonomous loop persist progress between review rounds?▼

The autonomous loop persists progress by maintaining a cumulative review log, specifically using REVIEW_STATE.json and AUTO_REVIEW.md files to document traceable round-by-round feedback and improvements.

Can I use alternative LLM APIs instead of OpenAI for iterative research fixes?▼

Yes, you can use alternative LLM APIs. The automated research review loop requires an OpenAI-compatible or alternative LLM API to coordinate cross-model critiques and iterative fixes across providers.

When should I not use an automated ML research review cycle?▼

You should avoid using an automated ML research review cycle if your project lacks an accessible llm-chat MCP server or if you do not need structured, traceable round-by-round documentation for progressive artifact improvements.