audiencia-previdenciaria

This Skill builds a three-phase plan: pre-hearing scripts for expert cross-examination and witness questioning, execution guidance during the hearing, and post-hearing closing arguments. You provide the case type, filed documents, and the facts that must be proven orally.

The Skill provides a six-step escalation script: confirm credentials, confirm what was examined, confirm document knowledge, point out specific omissions, expose contradictions between the exam and conclusion, and challenge the prognosis regarding retraining feasibility.

Closing arguments should include a procedural summary, analysis of documentary, expert, and witness evidence, FIRAC blocks connecting proof to legal theses, invocation of the dynamic burden of proof under art. 373 §1º CPC, anticipation of INSS appellate theses, and a request citing Súmulas 111 and 105 STJ.

Yes, it includes a dedicated interrogatory outline for rural time witnesses covering relationship to the claimant, type of work performed, regime (own land, third party, family), continuity, and payment form, plus separate outlines for incapacity and accident nexus witnesses.

Invoke it when the INSS failed to produce evidence it holds, such as the administrative dossier, updated CNIS records, or prior technical opinions. Under art. 373 §1º CPC, the burden falls on the party best positioned to produce the evidence, and omissions favor the insured.