assess-quality

Score LLM outputs against a rubric and output an XML verdict.

1|Updated Nov 19, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/manutej/meta-prompting-framework --skill assess-quality
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: assess-quality
Source: https://github.com/manutej/meta-prompting-framework/tree/main/skills/assess-quality
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/manutej/meta-prompting-framework --skill assess-quality

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured mechanism to evaluate LLM outputs against task requirements and decide whether iteration is needed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Quality scoring with a numerical score (0.0-1.0) and a verdict to guide next steps.
  • Evaluation against four criteria: Correctness, Completeness, Clarity, and Quality.
  • Integrates into prompt-improvement pipelines to decide when a result is production-ready.
  • Use cases include code generation, content creation, data-to-text tasks, and educational feedback loops.

Quick Start

Install or run via the CLI: assess-quality --task "Generate a palindrome checker" --output result.xml. Then review result.xml to determine if further iterations are required.

Frequently Asked Questions about assess-quality

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate LLM output quality against a specific task?▼

To evaluate LLM output quality, you can use a structured mechanism that assesses outputs against task requirements, producing a numerical score and rationale to decide whether further iteration is needed.

How do I automate prompt iteration using an LLM quality threshold?▼

You can automate prompt iteration by applying a quality threshold to LLM outputs. The evaluation produces an XML verdict with a 0.0-1.0 score, which can be used in pipelines to decide if a result is production-ready.

What criteria are used to assess LLM correctness and completeness?▼

Assessing LLM correctness and completeness involves evaluating outputs against four criteria: Correctness, Completeness, Clarity, and Quality. This rubric ensures a structured score and rationale for the generated text.

Can I use automated quality scoring for code generation and data-to-text tasks?▼

Yes, automated quality scoring applies to code generation, content creation, and data-to-text tasks. It evaluates the LLM output against your specified task and outputs a structured XML verdict suitable for automation.

What is the best way to run an LLM quality assessment via CLI?▼

The best way to run an LLM quality assessment via CLI is by executing a command with your task and output parameters, which generates an XML file containing the score and verdict to review if further iterations are required.