What problem does it solve? Manuscripts prepared with AI assistance can contain leftover LLM meta-comments, hallucinated references, placeholder data, and missing AI-use disclosures that trigger arXiv rejection or author bans. This Skill runs a structured submission-readiness preflight that locates concrete, citable evidence of these problems and produces a fix list with a PASS / PASS_WITH_FIXES / HOLD decision. ## Core Features & Use Cases - AI-artifact scanning: Detects LLM meta-comments, prompt residue, chat tokens, placeholders (TODO, XX%), and AI tools listed as authors using a data-driven regex pattern library. - Reference verification: Parses BibTeX, checks structural validity, and cross-references entries against Crossref, arXiv, OpenAlex, and Semantic Scholar to flag fabricated or mismatched citations. - Structured reporting: Merges extraction, scan, and verification outputs into a single Markdown report with severity-graded findings, file:line locations, and a human sign-off checklist. - Use Case: Before uploading a multi-file LaTeX paper to arXiv, run the preflight to catch an "As an AI language model" sentence left in methods.tex, an unverifiable citation in refs.bib, and an unfilled XX% placeholder in the results table. ## Quick Start Run an arXiv preflight check on my LaTeX project directory and tell me whether the manuscript is submission-ready with a list of any blocking issues.