architecture-fitness

Evaluates design artifacts and generates measurable scorecards for architecture reviews.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tgsatwit/agent-delivery-pub --skill architecture-fitness
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: architecture-fitness
Source: https://github.com/tgsatwit/agent-delivery-pub/tree/main/.claude/skills/architecture-fitness
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tgsatwit/agent-delivery-pub --skill architecture-fitness

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill replaces subjective design reviews with objective, quantitative metrics, making design quality measurable and ensuring adherence to architectural standards.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Quantitative Evaluation: Assesses design artifacts based on coupling, cohesion, complexity, and stability.
  • Scorecard Generation: Produces a clear scorecard with grades (A-F) and actionable recommendations.
  • Use Case: Before approving a new microservice design, use this Skill to evaluate its structural integrity, identify potential maintenance issues, and ensure it aligns with established architectural principles.

Quick Start

Use the architecture-fitness skill to evaluate the design document 'user-auth-service-design.md'.

Frequently Asked Questions about architecture-fitness

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate software architecture quality using quantitative metrics?▼

Evaluating software architecture quality involves analyzing component dependencies, interface contracts, and structural complexity against defined standards to generate a measurable scorecard. This approach replaces subjective design reviews with objective grades and actionable recommendations.

What metrics are used to measure code design fitness?▼

Code design fitness metrics include coupling, cohesion, complexity, and stability. These quantitative indicators assess the structural integrity of design artifacts to identify potential maintenance issues before development begins.

How do I generate a scorecard for a pre-build design review?▼

To generate a design review scorecard, input your design document for analysis against architecture standards. The system evaluates coupling and stability, producing clear A-F grades with actionable recommendations for pre-build approvals.

Can I assess microservice design quality before approving development?▼

Yes, assessing microservice design quality before development evaluates structural integrity against established architectural principles. This quantitative analysis identifies potential maintenance issues and ensures the new service design aligns with defined standards.

What is the best way to replace subjective design reviews with objective measurements?▼

The best way to replace subjective design reviews is by applying quantitative fitness metrics to evaluate design artifacts. This mechanism analyzes component dependencies and interface contracts to produce a measurable scorecard.

Does evaluating design fitness require analyzing component dependencies?▼

Yes, evaluating design fitness requires analyzing component dependencies, interface contracts, and structural complexity. This analysis is essential to accurately measure coupling and cohesion against defined architecture standards.