architect-review

To review an architecture design doc, apply a rubric-based critique that evaluates pasted RFCs, ADRs, and diagrams. This process returns prioritized, severity-tagged findings with concrete fixes and a clear verdict, helping catch missing risks early.

A grounding check in an architecture review flags load-bearing claims that are not backed by a cited surface or an explicit unverified marker. This ensures critical assertions in your design docs and RFCs are properly substantiated before approval.

Yes, you can assess serverless and GenAI or agentic systems through a well-architected lens mode. This evaluates designs through pillar and workload-class lenses to produce severity-tagged findings and a closing strengths section.

To prioritize architecture findings from a design critique, order them by severity levels: blockers, majors, minors, and nits. This prioritized list includes concrete fixes the author can apply to resolve specific issues.

The best way to evaluate an architecture diagram is to run a rubric-based critique that checks for misleading claims and missing risks. This yields a crisp verdict, ordered severity findings, and highlights the strengths worth keeping.