aras-peer-reviewer

Automate structured peer review of LaTeX manuscripts into JSON critiques.

Updated Mar 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Bhavya-Dhoot/Autonomous-Research-Agent-System-ARAS- --skill aras-peer-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aras-peer-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Bhavya-Dhoot/Autonomous-Research-Agent-System-ARAS-/tree/main/aras/skills/reviewing
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Bhavya-Dhoot/Autonomous-Research-Agent-System-ARAS- --skill aras-peer-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Peer review of research manuscripts is time-consuming and error-prone; this Skill automates a structured evaluation and scoring.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated JSON-based peer review scoring with major/minor issues
  • LaTeX paper.tex input handling and cycle-based revision gating
  • Actionable revision directives for authors and editors

Quick Start

Feed paper.tex to the Skill to generate a structured JSON peer-review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about aras-peer-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate peer review for a LaTeX research manuscript?▼

Automated peer review for a LaTeX manuscript requires feeding paper.tex into the Skill, which then applies a defined JSON schema to output rigorously formatted scores and actionable revision directives.

What is structured JSON peer review scoring and how does it work?▼

Structured JSON peer review scoring is an automated process that evaluates a research manuscript and outputs a rigorously formatted JSON file containing specific scores, identified issues, and revision directives for authors and editors.

Can I use this automated paper review tool during manuscript revision cycles?▼

Yes, the automated paper review tool is designed specifically for manuscript revision cycles, applying cycle-based scoring and revision gating to ensure authors address major and minor issues before proceeding.

What JSON schema format is required for generating an automated paper critique?▼

Generating an automated paper critique requires a defined JSON schema to enforce a rigorously formatted output, ensuring the resulting report consistently contains scores, issues, and actionable revision directives.

Does automated peer review distinguish between major and minor revision issues?▼

Yes, the automated peer review process distinguishes between major and minor issues, enforcing actionable revision directives in the JSON output to guide authors and editors through manuscript improvements.