ara-rigor-reviewer

What problem does it solve? Research artifacts need an objective epistemic critique before publication, but manually checking whether evidence truly supports claims, whether falsification criteria are meaningful, and whether the research process is honestly documented is slow and inconsistent. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Six-Dimension Scoring: Scores evidence relevance, falsifiability, scope calibration, argument coherence, exploration integrity, and methodological rigor on a 1-5 scale with defined anchors. - Severity-Ranked Findings: Produces constructive findings (critical, major, minor, suggestion) with verbatim evidence spans, reasoning, and actionable fixes. - Calibrated Grade: Computes a Strong Accept-to-Reject recommendation from dimension means and writes a structured level2_report.json to the artifact root. - Use Case: After Level 1 structural validation passes on an ARA directory, run this review to get an objective peer-review-style critique with questions for authors before releasing the artifact. ## Quick Start Run the ARA Seal Level 2 semantic epistemic review on the artifact directory at ./my-research-artifact and write level2_report.json to its root.