apex-review

Analyze git history and diffs to generate a prioritized cross-domain risk report.

69|8|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tonone-ai/tonone --skill apex-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: apex-review
Source: https://github.com/tonone-ai/tonone/tree/main/team/apex/skills/apex-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tonone-ai/tonone --skill apex-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps engineering teams identify and bridge gaps that span multiple specialties, ensuring changes align across components, domains, and handoffs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Surface cross-domain gaps and risks by reviewing recent work (code, design, docs) and comparing it against defined cross-cutting concerns.
  • Align specialists by surfacing consistency issues, interfaces, and boundary conditions that may cause integration problems.
  • Use case: before a major release, run this review to verify that security, performance, observability, data integrity, and CI/CD hooks are coherent across teams.

Quick Start

Run apex-review on the latest merge to surface cross-domain gaps and risks.

Frequently Asked Questions about apex-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I identify cross-cutting code review gaps before a major release?▼

Cross-cutting code review gaps are identified by analyzing recent git history and diffs to synthesize inputs from security, performance, observability, and infrastructure, generating a prioritized risk report.

What is a cross-domain engineering review and when do I need one?▼

A cross-domain engineering review bridges gaps across specialties by checking recent work against cross-cutting concerns. You need one for pre-release checks, post-merge quality control, and cross-team handoffs.

How do I run a cross-team handoff review to surface integration risks?▼

Run a cross-team handoff review by analyzing recent surface-level artifacts and code diffs to surface consistency issues, interfaces, and boundary conditions that may cause integration problems across teams.

Can I check data integrity and observability gaps together in a single review?▼

Yes, you can check data integrity and observability gaps together. The review synthesizes viewpoints from security, performance, observability, data integrity, infrastructure, and CI/CD into one actionable report.

Does cross-domain risk analysis work on surface-level artifacts or only full code audits?▼

Cross-domain risk analysis works on surface-level artifacts. It analyzes recent work including git history, diffs, and surface-level artifacts to produce prioritized, cross-domain risk recommendations.

What's the best way to align engineering specialists on boundary conditions and interfaces?▼

The best way to align engineering specialists is to surface consistency issues, interfaces, and boundary conditions by comparing recent work against defined cross-cutting concerns to prevent integration problems.