aped-triage

Classify and route incoming issues through a structured triage state machine.

2|Updated Mar 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yabafre/aped-claude --skill aped-triage
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aped-triage
Source: https://github.com/yabafre/aped-claude/tree/main/src/templates/skills/aped-triage
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yabafre/aped-claude --skill aped-triage

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It prevents inconsistent issue handling by forcing structured intake, evidence-backed classification, and scope-verified routing before any fix, deferment, or closure.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evidence-first triage: Captures title, reporter, reproduction steps, evidence, and affected artefact, asking the user when any required field is missing.
  • Scope verification gate: Reads current phase and active epic artefacts from state files, deciding out-of-scope versus in-scope without assumptions.
  • Deterministic routing outputs: Emits a triage decision artefact for downstream skills and records deferred items into an out-of-scope knowledge base.

Quick Start

When a user says "triage this issue" and includes the issue title, reproduction (or why it’s not applicable), and any error logs or screenshots, tell me to run aped-triage and produce triage-decision.md plus any out-of-scope record if needed.

Frequently Asked Questions about aped-triage

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I triage issues with evidence and route them based on sprint scope?▼

Issue triage with evidence requires capturing reproduction steps and affected artefacts, then verifying sprint and epic scope before routing. A structured triage state machine classifies each issue and emits a decision artefact for downstream skills.

What is the best way to classify incoming bug reports and feature requests in a project backlog?▼

Classifying bug reports and feature requests requires evidence-first intake, reading pipeline phase and active epic file sets from state outputs, and applying scope verification to decide in-scope versus out-of-scope routing deterministically.

How do I handle out-of-scope issues during product backlog triage?▼

Out-of-scope issues identified during triage are recorded into an out-of-scope knowledge base artefact, deferring them from the active sprint while preserving the classification decision and evidence for future pipeline phases.

Can I triage regressions and duplicates without manually checking active epic files?▼

Triage for regressions and duplicates respects sprint and epic scope by automatically reading pipeline phase and active epic file sets from state outputs, enforcing missing-field prompts to ensure complete evidence before classification.

What happens if a bug report is missing reproduction steps or evidence during priority routing?▼

Missing reproduction steps or evidence trigger missing-field prompts that ask the user for required fields before classification proceeds, ensuring no issue is routed downstream without complete evidence and affected artefact details.