aif-grounded

Require verifiable evidence before answering fact-sensitive requests.

Updated May 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vulikjulik/DeepLom --skill aif-grounded-vulikjulik
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: aif-grounded
Source: https://github.com/vulikjulik/DeepLom/tree/main/.opencode/skills/aif-grounded
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vulikjulik/DeepLom --skill aif-grounded-vulikjulik

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill eliminates the risk of AI-generated hallucinations, unsubstantiated guesses, and incorrect assumptions that lead to unreliable outputs, especially for high-stakes, fact-sensitive requests where accuracy is non-negotiable.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 100% Confidence Gate: Only delivers final answers when every factual claim is fully supported by verifiable evidence from the local codebase, command outputs, authoritative documentation, or user-provided sources.
  • Explicit Uncertainty Handling: Returns a structured insufficient information response with a clear checklist of missing evidence instead of making guesses or filling knowledge gaps with assumptions.
  • Evidence-First Workflow: Automatically classifies requests, identifies required evidence sources, and verifies changeable facts (such as current versions, latest policies, or live system states) before generating any output.
  • Use Case: Ideal for security audits, financial compliance checks, legal research, codebase analysis, or any user request that explicitly demands no hallucinations, only if verified, or 100% sure answers.

Quick Start

Invoke the aif-grounded skill when you need a fully verified answer to a high-stakes question, and it will only respond if it can confirm 100% confidence with available evidence.

Frequently Asked Questions about aif-grounded

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I prevent AI hallucinations during codebase analysis and security audits?▼

To prevent AI hallucinations during codebase analysis, you need an evidence-based confidence gate that blocks unsubstantiated claims. This approach requires explicit sourcing from local codebases or command outputs, returning a missing evidence checklist instead of guessing when information is insufficient.

What is an evidence-first workflow for high-stakes fact verification?▼

An evidence-first workflow for fact verification classifies requests, identifies required evidence sources, and verifies changeable facts before generating any output. It enforces a 100% confidence gate by matching claims against authoritative documentation or user-provided sources.

How do I enforce no assumptions for AI responses in financial compliance checks?▼

To enforce no assumptions for AI responses in financial compliance checks, apply guardrails that require explicit evidence sourcing. If full confidence cannot be achieved, the system must return a structured insufficient information response detailing the missing evidence.

Does 100% confidence fact verification work with user-provided documentation?▼

Yes, 100% confidence fact verification works with user-provided documentation by treating it as an explicit evidence source. The system verifies all changeable facts against these provided sources before delivering a final answer, ensuring zero hallucinations.

What happens when there is insufficient information for a fully verified answer?▼

When there is insufficient information for a fully verified answer, the system returns a structured insufficient information response. This response includes a clear checklist of missing evidence, explicitly blocking hallucinations and unsubstantiated guesses.