agents-vs-agents

Evaluate adversarial AI behavior across triad interactions to uncover guardrail weaknesses.

7|7|Updated Mar 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/civitas-cerebrum/element-interactions --skill agents-vs-agents
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: agents-vs-agents
Source: https://github.com/civitas-cerebrum/element-interactions/tree/main/skills/agents-vs-agents
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/civitas-cerebrum/element-interactions --skill agents-vs-agents

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured framework for adversarial AI testing by orchestrating interactions between an adversary LLM, the target AI, and a judging LLM. It helps teams validate guardrails, detect weak spots, and improve compliance across AI-enabled systems.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adversary–target–judge orchestration: three roles generate, respond, and evaluate conversations to reveal guardrail erosion over multiple turns.
  • Structured outputs and persistence: JSON-based messages and transcripts are used to maintain traceability across tests.
  • Compliance and safety checks: supports prompt-injection, bias detection, data leakage risk, and scope containment testing.

Quick Start

Run an adversary–judge loop against your AI interface to expose guardrails and review outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions about agents-vs-agents

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How does adversarial AI testing uncover guardrail weaknesses?▼

Adversarial AI testing uncovers guardrail weaknesses by orchestrating multi-turn interactions between an adversary LLM, a target AI, and a judge to evaluate behavior and detect erosion over time.

How do I run a prompt injection test against my AI application?▼

You run a prompt injection test by executing an adversary-judge loop against your AI interface, generating adversarial prompts, and evaluating the target AI's responses to identify guardrail failures.

Can I use this for compliance auditing and bias detection?▼

Yes, you can use this for compliance auditing and bias detection. The framework supports structured JSON-based outputs to maintain traceability across safety checks, data leakage risks, and scope containment tests.

What is the best way to evaluate AI behavior over multiple turns?▼

The best way to evaluate AI behavior over multiple turns is using a triad interaction protocol where an adversary generates inputs, the target AI responds, and a judge evaluates the transcripts for guardrail erosion.

Do I need specific dependencies to perform red-teaming on my AI?▼

No specific dependencies are required to perform red-teaming. The framework operates independently, using JSON-based messages and persistence to maintain traceability during adversarial testing.