What problem does it solve? High-stakes decisions often get a single agreeable AI answer that hides real tradeoffs. This Skill convenes a council of agents with deliberately conflicting mandates, runs them in isolation so none can soften against another, then forces one adjudicator to resolve the conflict into a ranked, defensible recommendation. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured disagreement: Council members (Pessimist, Optimist, CFO, SRE, etc.) argue in isolation from identical dossiers, so genuine conflicts surface instead of being averaged away. - Weighted adjudication: Criteria weights are locked before any member runs, and the Oracle adjudicator must name the deciding factor and the strongest objection it overrules. - Persisted, re-testable runs: Every run is saved with frame, dossier, member arguments, and verdict, so a past decision can be re-tested under changed weights via the weight-sweep script. - Use Case: Deciding whether to relocate a family, migrate infrastructure, or change business strategy — convene the family, technical, or executive roster, get a ranked recommendation with named dissent, and publish a board-record artifact. ## Quick Start Convene an advisory board using the family roster to evaluate whether we should relocate to another city this year.
