adversarial-review

Adversarial code review challenges design choices in local code changes to surface architecture issues early. It evaluates risk assumptions and maintainability tradeoffs across base-branch, working-tree, or auto scope scenarios to catch deeper design implications.

Invoke the adversarial review with explicit arguments to challenge local changes. Specify the target scope using --base, --scope, or --model flags to evaluate base-branch, working-tree, or auto scenarios, while preserving any user-provided focus text.

Yes, you can target specific architecture questions by providing optional focus text alongside --base, --scope, and --model arguments. The review preserves your focus text and enforces explicit argument handling to evaluate the specified changes.

Adversarial code review is ideal for high-risk refactors and risky migrations. It performs a design-challenging critique of branch changes to evaluate architecture, safety, and maintainability tradeoffs that regular reviews might miss.

Use adversarial review when a regular code review might miss deeper design implications. It is built to challenge design tradeoffs, risk assumptions, and architecture questions in local code changes before they become critical issues.