admet-predictor

Predict ADMET liabilities and assign A/B/C/D/F verdicts from physicochemical CSV data.

4|1|Updated Jan 8, 2024
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg --skill admet-predictor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: admet-predictor
Source: https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg/tree/main/.claude/skills/admet-predictor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OpenSourcePharmaFoundation/ospf-ayurveda-kg --skill admet-predictor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The ADMET predictor prevents promising compounds from failing late by estimating absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity risks from structure-derived physicochemical properties.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • ADMET-focused go/no-go verdicts: Produces A/B/C/D/F classifications to advance or reject candidates based on rule-of-thumb thresholds and structural alert logic.
  • Absorption and delivery feasibility checks: Assesses oral-like versus topical/mucosal feasibility with OM-specific considerations (PSA/LogP, mucoadhesion, and inflamed-tissue context).
  • Cancer-patient DDI risk framing: Flags plausible CYP interaction liabilities using the project’s mechanism/target CSVs and typical chemo regimens as context.
  • Plant compound fairness: Avoids blindly rejecting natural products with poor oral Ro5 metrics by emphasizing delivery-route alternatives for OM.

Quick Start

Use the admet-predictor skill to evaluate a candidate compound’s ADMET profile and receive a ranked verdict plus recommended delivery de-risking actions.

Frequently Asked Questions about admet-predictor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I predict ADMET liabilities for drug repurposing candidates?▼

Predict ADMET liabilities by processing project CSV files containing physicochemical columns like molecular_weight, alogp, hba, hbd, and psa. The tool applies rule-based tiering and structural alerts to generate go/no-go classifications for candidate compounds.

What is the best way to screen natural products for oral mucositis treatment?▼

Screen natural products for oral mucositis by evaluating phytochemical absorption and delivery feasibility. The method avoids blindly rejecting plant-derived compounds with poor oral Ro5 metrics by emphasizing topical or mucosal delivery route alternatives.

How does CYP450 interaction risk framing work for cancer patients?▼

CYP450 interaction risk framing flags plausible drug-drug interactions by cross-referencing the project's mechanism and target CSVs against typical chemotherapy regimens. This identifies candidate compounds with potential CYP liabilities in cancer patient populations.

Can I assess oral versus topical delivery feasibility using physicochemical properties?▼

Assess oral versus topical delivery feasibility by analyzing PSA, LogP, and mucoadhesion properties within the inflamed-tissue context. The evaluation checks physicochemical thresholds to determine if a compound suits oral-like or mucosal delivery routes.

What ADMET classification system does this toxicity screening use?▼

The toxicity screening uses an A/B/C/D/F classification system to advance or reject candidates based on rule-of-thumb thresholds and structural alert logic. This tiering framework directly supports go/no-go decisions for candidate compounds.

When should I not rely on rule-of-five violations for natural product screening?▼

Avoid relying solely on rule-of-five violations for natural products with poor oral Ro5 metrics when alternative delivery routes exist. The approach emphasizes delivery-route alternatives for oral mucositis applications rather than rejecting compounds outright.