5d-verify

Automate multi-layer verification of implemented features against plan and spec.

5|Updated Jan 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tapania/5d-skills --skill 5d-verify
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: 5d-verify
Source: https://github.com/tapania/5d-skills/tree/main/skills/5d-verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tapania/5d-skills --skill 5d-verify

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides structured, multi-layer verification to ensure implemented features align with the original plan, spec, and user intent, reducing defects before release.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Layered Verification: Checks technical correctness, spec fidelity, and plan validity across the development lifecycle.
  • Failure Routing & Reporting: Routes issues to BUILD, SPEC, PLAN, or SPAR phases and produces a clear Verification Report.
  • Acceptance & Documentation: Supports automated checks, manual comparisons, and user acceptance testing with traceable outcomes.

Quick Start

Activate the verify phase after finishing BUILD and run the verification workflow to generate a report.

Frequently Asked Questions about 5d-verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify implemented features against the original spec after a build?▼

To verify implemented features against the original spec, run multi-layer validation checks across technical correctness, spec fidelity, and plan validity after the build phase to ensure alignment and reduce defects.

What is multi-layer verification in software QA workflows?▼

Multi-layer verification in software QA is a process that checks technical correctness, spec fidelity, and plan validity across the development lifecycle to ensure implemented features align with the original plan and user intent.

How do I route verification failures back to the correct development phase?▼

Route verification failures by categorizing issues into BUILD, SPEC, PLAN, or SPAR phases during the validation workflow, which produces a structured Verification Report with clear failure routing for targeted fixes.

What checks are required for user acceptance testing and spec comparison?▼

User acceptance testing and spec comparison require running automated checks for build and lint, executing tests, and performing manual spec comparisons to generate traceable validation outcomes and a comprehensive Verification Report.

Can I use automated lint and tests for manual spec comparison workflows?▼

Yes, automated lint and test checks run alongside manual spec comparison workflows to validate technical correctness, ensuring implemented features match the original plan and spec before producing a structured Verification Report.

When should I run the verification workflow in the development lifecycle?▼

Run the verification workflow after finishing the build phase and before release, applying it during validation, testing, and user acceptance to check technical correctness, spec fidelity, and plan validity.